Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1584443rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1584443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1584443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683598lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1584443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443254lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1584443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1517004lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:dateCreated1992-6-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:abstractTextIn view of the possible intracavitary breakage of an IUD, an experimental model was created to evaluate resistance to mechanical stress in new IUDs and IUDs which had been used for varying periods (6-12-24 months). The results of the study showed that, in addition to a slight inhomogeneity of the product which is probably due to incorrect industrial manufacturing procedures, there is also a correlation between the risk of breakage and intrauterine ageing which is particularly evident in some IUDS.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:languageitalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:issn0026-4784lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LiottaLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VolpeRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CustoG MGMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SaittoCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CerzaSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ScocciaGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:volume44lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:pagination139-46lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1584443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1584443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1584443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1584443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1584443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:articleTitle[Mechanical resistance of intrauterine devices. Experimental evaluation].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:affiliationIstituto di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Università di Perugia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1584443pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed