Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15839265rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0920367lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15839265lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038215lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:dateCreated2005-4-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:abstractTextThe two previously reported calculations of the amplitude distribution of speckles in optical coherence tomography, each based on a different mathematical formulation, yield different results. We show that a modification of an initial assumption in one of the formulations leads to equivalent results.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:issn1084-7529lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LasserTheoTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaramataBoris...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HasslerKaïKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LaubscherMark...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:pagination593-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15839265...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:articleTitleSpeckle statistics in optical coherence tomography.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:affiliationLaboratoire d'Optique Biomédicale, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. boris.karamata@a3.epfl.chlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15839265pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed