Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1576127rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1576127lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018823lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1576127lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1576127lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1576127lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521721lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:issue2 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:dateCreated1992-6-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:abstractTextBetween March 1984 and July 1990 our team transplanted 168 hearts. One hundred twelve patients did not require mechanical support (group I). Fifty-six patients required mechanical support (group II). Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation was used in 37 patients (66%). The total artificial heart (TAH) was used in 16 patients (29%), and the ventricular assist device (VAD) was used in three patients (5%). The time spent on the device ranged from 1 to 35 days. No statistical difference was noted on the survival between the two groups. The 30-day and 1-year survival rate was 95% (106 patients) and 71% (79 patients) in group I and 91% (51 patients) and 68% (38 patients) in group II. As of July 31, 1990, 70% in group I and 68% in group II are alive. No significant differences were found between the two groups for the following variables (after heart transplantation): length of stay, 30-day survival, 1-year survival, and complications. The only significant difference found between the two groups was the incidence of infections: group I, 23%; group II, 51.7% (p = 0.001). Mechanical support as a bridge to transplantation provides excellent support until a donor becomes available. No difference was found in the 30-day and 1-year survival between the two groups.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:issn1053-2498lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PifarreRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SullivanHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MontoyaAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BakhosMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BlakemanBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Costanzo-Nord...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GriecoJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AltergottRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FoyB KBKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LonchynaVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:authorsCompleteNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:pagination235-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1576127-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:articleTitleComparison of results after heart transplantation: mechanically supported versus nonsupported patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill. 60153.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1576127pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed