Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15690800rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0150369lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15690800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376624lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15690800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15690800lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014406lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:dateCreated2005-2-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:abstractTextOn-farm methods of monitoring Escherichia coli O157:H7 were assessed in 30 experimentally inoculated steers housed in four pens over a 12-week period and in 202,878 naturally colonized feedlot cattle housed in 1,160 pens on four commercial Alberta feedlots over a 1-year period. In the challenge study, yearling steers were experimentally inoculated with 10(10) CFU of a four-strain mixture of nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli O157:H7. After inoculation, shedding of E. coli O157:H7 was monitored weekly by collecting rectal fecal samples (FEC), oral swabs (ORL), pooled fecal pats (PAT), manila ropes (ROP) orally accessed for 4 h, feed samples, water, and water bowl interface. Collection of FEC from all animals per pen provided superior isolation (P < 0.01) of E. coli O157:H7 compared with other methods, although labor and animal restraint requirements for fecal sample collection were high. When one sample was collected per pen of animals, E. coli O157:H7 was more likely to be detected from the ROP than from the FEC, PAT, or ORL (P < 0.001). In the commercial feedlot study, samples were limited to ROP and PAT, and E. coli O157:H7 was isolated in 18.8% of PAT and 6.8% of ROP samples. However, for animals that had been resident in the feedlot pen for at least 1 month, isolation of E. coli O157:H7 from ROP was not different from that from PAT (P = 0.35). Pens of animals on feed for <30 days were six times more likely to shed E. coli O157:H7 than were animals on feed for >30 days. However, change in diet did not affect shedding of the organism (P > 0.23) provided that animals had acclimated to the feedlot for 1 month or longer. Findings from this study indicate the importance of introduction of mitigation strategies early in the feeding period to reduce transference and the degree to which E. coli O157:H7 is shed into the environment.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:issn0362-028Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McAllisterT...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HansenJ RJRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BachS JSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StanfordKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarxT HTHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WallinsG LGLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZahiroddiniHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:volume68lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:pagination26-33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15690800...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:articleTitleMonitoring Escherichia coli O157:H7 in inoculated and naturally colonized feedlot cattle and their environment.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:affiliationAlberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Agriculture Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4V6. kim.stanford@gov.ab.calld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15690800pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15690800lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15690800lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15690800lld:pubmed