Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15666298rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007634lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205103lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205419lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0520510lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012222lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1533691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1096776lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1512888lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:dateCreated2005-2-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:abstractTextIn vitro measurements of skin absorption are an increasingly important aspect of regulatory studies, product support claims, and formulation screening. However, such measurements are significantly affected by skin variability. The purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intralaboratory variation in diffusion cell measurements caused by factors other than skin. This was attained through the use of an artificial (silicone rubber) rate-limiting membrane and the provision of materials including a standard penetrant, methyl paraben (MP), and a minimally prescriptive protocol to each of the 18 participating laboratories. "Standardized" calculations of MP flux were determined from the data submitted by each laboratory by applying a predefined mathematical model. This was deemed necessary to eliminate any interlaboratory variation caused by different methods of flux calculations. Average fluxes of MP calculated and reported by each laboratory (60 +/- 27 microg cm(-2) h(-1), n = 25, range 27-101) were in agreement with the standardized calculations of MP flux (60 +/- 21 microg cm(-2) h(-1), range 19-120). The coefficient of variation between laboratories was approximately 35% and was manifest as a fourfold difference between the lowest and highest average flux values and a sixfold difference between the lowest and highest individual flux values. Intralaboratory variation was lower, averaging 10% for five individuals using the same equipment within a single laboratory. Further studies should be performed to clarify the exact components responsible for nonskin-related variability in diffusion cell measurements. It is clear that further developments of in vitro methodologies for measuring skin absorption are required.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:issn0022-3549lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CrossSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YamamotoAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GreenD MDMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HadgraftJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeezerA EAElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LimS TSTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobertsMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilliamsF MFMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MorrisAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrownM BMBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchenkDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GANOS NSNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SimpsonAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JarvisC ACAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SimonsenLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FinninB CBClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilkinsonS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GallagherS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WatkinsonAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaralKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KastingG BGBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McNaughtonG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BungeA LALlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BurgessS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GunnRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KamiyamaFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeardC MCMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Du PlessisJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RoperC SCSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:QuanY SYSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PellettM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FarinhaAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RaghavanS LSLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChilcottR PRPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DaltonC HCHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrottetLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrainS ISIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GwytherR LRLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeyE EEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NazemiM HMHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RomonchukWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TraversaB DBDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:volume94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:pagination632-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15666298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:articleTitleInter- and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: an international multicenter study using quasi-standardized methods and materials.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:affiliationDstl Biomedical Sciences, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ, United Kingdom. rchilcott@dstl.gov.uklld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15666298pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15666298lld:pubmed