Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1563877rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020792lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010055lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022116lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034897lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:dateCreated1992-5-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:abstractTextCurrent techniques for the detection of recurrent coronary stenoses following bypass grafting have shown disappointing diagnostic accuracy. This study used the same dipyridamole-handgrip stress to compare the accuracy of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography, in 50 consecutive post-bypass patients undergoing coronary arteriography at a mean interval of 6.5 years after surgery. Significant stenoses in native coronary vessels (greater than 50% diameter) or grafts (greater than 70% diameter) were defined by quantitative angiography. Forty-six patients had recurrent or residual stenoses, 43 (93%) had a perfusion defect identified by positron emission tomography, and 35 (76%) were identified by single photon emission computed tomography (P = 0.04). Fourteen of the 17 patients (82%) without previous Q-wave myocardial infarction were identified by positron emission tomography; 10 of the 17 (59%) were detected by single photon emission computed tomography (P = NS). Stress-induced perfusion defects were demonstrated by positron emission tomography in 19 patients; of this group, thallium imaging identified reversible defects in 11, showed no perfusion defect in 1, and portrayed a persistent defect in 7 patients. Significant graft disease was present in 33 patients; perfusion defects were identified by positron emission tomography in 30 (91%), and by single photon emission computed tomography in 24 (73%, P = NS). Four patients were fully revascularized, without significant recurrent coronary disease; normal perfusion was present in 3 (75%) by positron emission tomography, and 4 (100%) by single photon emission computed tomography.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:issn0167-5273lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SahaG BGBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HOR WRWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MacIntyreW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LafontAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarwickT HTHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UnderwoodD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:volume35lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:pagination33-41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1563877-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:articleTitleIdentification of recurrent ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison of positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1563877pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed