Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15575918rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376387lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018823lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1720825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0541315lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0870071lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:dateCreated2004-12-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:abstractTextEverolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor, is an immunosuppressant that targets the primary causes of progressive allograft dysfunction, thus improving the long-term outcome after heart transplantation. The present study investigated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus would benefit heart transplant patients. Data from a twelve-month phase III trial comparing everolimus (1.5 or 3 mg daily) with azathioprine were used to evaluate everolimus pharmacokinetics, exposure-efficacy/safety and TDM prognostic simulations. Everolimus trough levels were stable in the first year post-transplant and averaged 5.2 +/- 3.8 and 9.4 +/- 6.3 ng/mL in patients treated with 1.5 and 3 mg/day, respectively. Cyclosporine trough levels were similar in all treatment groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reduced with everolimus trough levels > or =3 ng/mL. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis showed evidence of reduced vasculopathy at 12 months with increasing everolimus exposure. Unlike cyclosporine, increasing everolimus exposure was not related to a higher rate of renal dysfunction. The TDM simulation, which was based on two everolimus dose adjustments and an initial starting dose of 1.5 mg/day, showed that the simulated BPAR rate (with TDM) was 21% versus 26% in the group with fixed dosing. Therefore, TDM in heart transplantation could optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:issn1600-6135lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StarlingRanda...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KovarikJohn...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HareJoshua...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmidliHeinz...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McCurryKennet...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HauptmanPaulPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MayerHartmut...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:pagination2126-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:dateRevised2007-2-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15575918...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:articleTitleTherapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in heart transplant recipients based on exposure-effect modeling.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland, OH, USA. starlir@ccf.orglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15575918pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Trial, Phase IIIlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15575918lld:pubmed