Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15561813rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024109lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002871lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006141lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699889lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0357126lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0937950lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:dateCreated2004-11-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:abstractTextAn important clinical question is the relative efficacy of the most common dosages of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp; Amgen Inc.; Thousand Oaks, CA) 200 microg every 2 weeks (Q2W) and epoetin alfa (Procrit; Ortho Biotech Products, LP; Raritan, NJ) 40,000 U weekly (QW) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. We designed three concurrent randomized, open-label, multicenter, identical trials (with the exception of tumor type criteria of breast, gynecologic, or lung cancer) of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia to validate the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Anemia (PSQ-An) treatment tool and to compare the efficacies and safety profiles of these two agents. In each trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either darbepoetin alfa at a dose of 200 microg Q2W or epoetin alfa at a dose of 40,000 U QW for up to 16 weeks. The PSQ-An was assessed for validity, feasibility, and reliability. Secondary clinical endpoints were analyzed using the primary analysis set. Both individual trial analyses and a protocol-specified combined analysis of data from all three trials were conducted. Overall, 312 patients (157 darbepoetin alfa; 155 epoetin alfa) were randomized and received study drug. Baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups in each trial and overall. The PSQ-An was valid, feasible, and reliable. In general, no difference between treatment groups was observed for hemoglobin- and transfusion-based endpoints in each individual trial or in the combined analysis. From exploratory analyses, achievement and maintenance of a hemoglobin target range (11-13 g/dl) were similar in both groups. No differences in safety were observed. With the PSQ-An, formal comparisons of the impact of anemia therapies on patients and caregivers can be made in future prospective studies. Further, darbepoetin alfa (200 microg Q2W) and epoetin alfa (40,000 U QW) appear to achieve comparable clinical and hematologic outcomes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:issn1083-7159lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchwartzbergL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TomitaDianneDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WallaceJoelJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CharuVeenaVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RossiGregGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YeeLorrin KLKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SenecalFrank...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:pagination696-707lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15561813...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:articleTitleA randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with breast, lung, or gynecologic cancer.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:affiliationThe West Clinic, 100 North Humphreys Boulevard, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA. lschwartzberg@westclinic.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15561813pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15561813lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15561813lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:15561813lld:pubmed