Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15507175rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0278488lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0246415lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0671970lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282460lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205195lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205088lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:dateCreated2004-10-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:abstractTextThe addition of capecitabine to docetaxel on a 3-week schedule resulted in superior response rate, increased time to progression (TTP), and improved overall survival in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Because the toxicity profile of weekly docetaxel differs from the standard 21-day docetaxel schedule, we performed a phase I/II trial to test the efficacy and safety of weekly docetaxel in combination with capecitabine given for 14 days every 21 days. The phase I study identified the doses of docetaxel (30 mg/m2 weekly) and capecitabine (900 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 every 21 days) used in phase II. Twenty female patients with measurable or assessable MBC were enrolled. Eighteen patients had previously received anthracyclines; 2 had contraindications to anthracyclines. Patients remained on study for a maximum of eight 3-week cycles or until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred; response assessments were scheduled after cycle 2, 5, and 8. Seventeen patients were assessed after cycle 2; 3 subjects (18%) had a partial response (PR), 9 had stable disease (53%; SD), and 5 patients (29%) had progressive disease (PD). Ten patients were assessable after cycle 5. Two patients (20%) had a PR, 5 patients (50%) had SD, and 3 patients (30%) had PD. The most common grade 3 toxicities were nail loss (45%), asthenia (30%), and hand-foot syndrome (30%), and toxicities led to study discontinuation in 10 patients. The median time to treatment failure was 10 weeks and median TTP was 26 weeks. The median duration of response was 9 weeks and the median duration of SD was 16 weeks. The median overall survival was 82 weeks. This schedule of weekly docetaxel in combination with day 1-14 capecitabine has activity; however, toxicity discourages the use of this schedule in lieu of the standard docetaxel/capecitabine regimen.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:issn1526-8209lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MackeyJohn...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoskiSheryl...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithStephani...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AuHeather-Jan...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SoulieresDeni...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JoyAnil AAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TonkinKatia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ScarfeAndrew...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmylieMichael...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BodnarDianne...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:volume5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:pagination287-92lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15507175...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:articleTitleFinal results of a phase II clinical trial of weekly docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:affiliationCross Cancer Institute, Universite de Montreal Canada. johnmack@cancerboard.ab.calld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15507175pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Trial, Phase IIlld:pubmed