Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1547072rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042449lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1547072lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948041lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1547072lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0741847lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1547072lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0444498lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:dateCreated1992-4-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:abstractTextWith close surveillance, deteriorating hemodynamics may signal a failing in situ bypass that can be salvaged by timely intervention. The purpose of this report is to summarize our experience with in situ bypass salvage using interventional radiology. Twenty-nine patients underwent arteriography following bypass occlusion or when an ankle/brachial index reduction of greater than 0.15 was detected between two consecutive office visits. Eighteen percutaneous transluminal dilatations were performed; one patient underwent repeat dilatation after 36 months, a second had four dilatations over 40 months. Ten significant arteriovenous fistulae were identified and were successfully embolized with 3 mm coils. One patient underwent excision of a retained valve. Six patients had initial fibrinolytic therapy for graft occlusion. The morbidity of these interventions was low; one bypass was disrupted following percutaneous transluminal dilatation but was successfully salvaged surgically. The average time from the original surgery to intervention was six months (one to 26 months); and the average follow-up after intervention was 22 months (three to 62 months) over which time patency was maintained in the majority. When a correctable problem is identified with appropriate vascular lab surveillance, interventional radiology is a useful alternative to surgery for bypass salvage.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:issn0890-5096lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SnidermanK...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TittleyJ GJGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KalmanP GPGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:volume6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:pagination25-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1547072-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:articleTitleRadiological intervention for the failing in situ vein bypass.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:affiliationToronto General Hospital, Division of Vascular Surgery, Ontario, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1547072pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed