Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15353709rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011350lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1557561lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871261lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027946lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:issue1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:dateCreated2004-9-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:abstractTextElectron Paramagnetic Resonance dosimetry based on tooth enamel has one important application in dose reconstruction of nuclear plant workers, where the contribution of neutrons to individual dose is often important. Evaluation of tooth enamel response to neutrons is thus an important goal. A few experimental data at thermal and fast neutron energies are available. A first evaluation of the tooth enamel relative response to 60Co in monoenergetic neutron flux of 2.8 and of 14 MeV, published elsewhere, has provided results apparently non-consistent with the results obtained at lower and higher energies. A comparison of those results in the 2.8 and 14 MeV beams with those available in the literature for other beams is reported and possible reasons for incongruities are discussed. Dose conversion factors of enamel to the water and air are also calculated and reported.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:issn0144-8420lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PillonMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AngeloniAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FattibenePPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:authorpubmed-author:De CosteVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:volume110lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:pagination559-63lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15353709...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:articleTitleIn phantom Dosimetric response of tooth enamel to neutrons.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:affiliationIstituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Rome, Italy. paola.fattibene@iss.itlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15353709pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed