| pubmed-article:15275266 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0014507 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0242781 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0040203 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0237881 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0750502 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:issue | 12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2004-7-27 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:abstractText | Until recently, the transmission of tick-borne pathogens via vertebrates was thought to depend on the development of a systemic infection in the vertebrate hosts. Pathogen transmission has now been shown to occur between infected and uninfected ticks co-feeding in time or space in the absence of a systemic infection, originally for viruses, but now also for bacteria. The epidemiological consequences of this new non-systemic transmission pathway necessitate a major reassessment of the components and dynamics of tick-borne pathogen enzootic cycles. Here Sarah Randolph, Lise Gern and Pat Nuttall show that a much wider range of natural hosts than was previously recognized may contribute significantly to the transmission of tick-borne diseases, and compare quantitatively the relative contributions made by the systemic and non-systemic transmission pathways. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:status | PubMed-not-MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:month | Dec | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:issn | 0169-4758 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NuttallP APA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GerpJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RandolphS ESE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:volume | 12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:pagination | 472-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2009-9-29 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:year | 1996 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:articleTitle | Co-feeding ticks: Epidemiological significance for tick-borne pathogen transmission. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK. sarah.randolph@zoology.ox.ac.uk | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15275266 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15275266 | lld:pubmed |
