Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15169102rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0061928lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231239lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043309lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521116lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947916lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521802lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0591126lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0233929lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:issue4 Pt 2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:dateCreated2004-5-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:abstractTextWe have measured the x-ray power and energy radiated by a tungsten-wire-array z pinch as a function of the peak pinch current and the width of the anode-cathode gap at the base of the pinch. The measurements were performed at 13- and 19-MA currents and 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-mm gaps. The wire material, number of wires, wire-array diameter, wire-array length, wire-array-electrode design, normalized-pinch-current time history, implosion time, and diagnostic package were held constant for the experiments. To keep the implosion time constant, the mass of the array was increased as I2 (i.e., the diameter of each wire was increased as I), where I is the peak pinch current. At 19 MA, the mass of the 300-wire 20-mm-diam 10-mm-length array was 5.9 mg. For the configuration studied, we find that to eliminate the effects of gap closure on the radiated energy, the width of the gap must be increased approximately as I. For shots unaffected by gap closure, we find that the peak radiated x-ray power P(r) proportional to I1.24+/-0.18, the total radiated x-ray energy E(r) proportional to I1.73+/-0.18, the x-ray-power rise time tau(r) proportional to I0.39+/-0.34, and the x-ray-power pulse width tau(w) proportional to demonstrate that the internal energy and radiative opacity of the pinch are not responsible for the observed subquadratic power scaling. Heuristic wire-ablation arguments suggest that quadratic power scaling will be achieved if the implosion time tau(i) is scaled as I(-1/3). The measured 1sigma shot-to-shot fluctuations in P(r), E(r), tau(r), tau(w), and tau(i) are approximately 12%, 9%, 26%, 9%, and 2%, respectively, assuming that the fluctuations are independent of I. These variations are for one-half of the pinch. If the half observed radiates in a manner that is statistically independent of the other half, the variations are a factor of 2(1/2) less for the entire pinch. We calculate the effect that shot-to-shot fluctuations of a single pinch would have on the shot-success probability of the double-pinch inertial-confinement-fusion driver proposed by Hammer et al. [Phys. Plasmas 6, 2129 (1999)]. We find that on a given shot, the probability that two independent pinches would radiate the same peak power to within a factor of 1+/-alpha (where 0< or =alpha<<1) is equal to erf(alpha/2sigma), where sigma is the 1sigma fractional variation of the peak power radiated by a single pinch. Assuming alpha must be < or =7% to achieve adequate odd-Legendre-mode radiation symmetry for thermonuclear-fusion experiments, sigma must be <3% for the shot-success probability to be > or =90%. The observed (12/2(1/2))%=8.5% fluctuation in P(r) would provide adequate symmetry on 44% of the shots. We propose that three-dimensional radiative-magnetohydrodynamic simulations be performed to quantify the sensitivity of the x-ray emission to various initial conditions, and to determine whether an imploding z pinch is a spatiotemporal chaotic system.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:statusPubMed-not-MEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:issn1539-3755lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SimpsonW WWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillsJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaileyJ EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LiuM KMKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RamirezJ JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BlissD EDElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PorterJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RomeroT MTMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TorreyJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FehlD LDLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McDanielD HDHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McKenneyJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BennettG RGRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CuneoM EMElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MuronD JDJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeeperR JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StygarW AWAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpielmanR BRBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VeseyR ARAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RugglesL ELElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SeamenJ JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McGurnJ SJSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChandlerG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StruveK WKWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IvesH CHClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MazarakisM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MatzenM KMKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SeamenJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpeasC SCSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WagonerT CTClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GillilandT...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HorryM LMLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JobeD ODOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LazierS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MulvilleT DTDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PyleJ HJHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmelserR MRMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:volume69lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:pagination046403lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:articleTitleX-ray emission from z pinches at 10 7 A: current scaling, gap closure, and shot-to-shot fluctuations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:affiliationSandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-1196, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15169102pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed