Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15119019rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002092lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15119019lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242618lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15119019lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039789lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15119019lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0524527lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15119019lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:issue94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:dateCreated2004-5-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:abstractTextBioequivalence of formulations must be established by proving that the differences between the formulations are within a specified interval according to Equation 1, the Interval Hypothesis. Explicit estimates of sample size determined from Equation 8 and listed in Table 1 are qualitatively larger than those that would be determined from Equation 2, the Hypothesis of No Difference. Equation 8 was derived from the TOST procedure; other valid methods should yield comparable results. In any context, this discussion has illustrated that the failure to demonstrate a difference is not sufficient to demonstrate equivalence, and that a properly powered equivalence study of allergen formulations will generally demand many more than four study subjects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:issn0936-8671lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RabinRonald...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PastorRichard...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SlaterJay EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LachenbruchPe...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:pagination24-33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15119019...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:articleTitleSample size considerations for establishing clinical bioequivalence of allergen formulations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:affiliationUS Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation, 1401 Rockville Pike (HFM-422), Rockville, MD 20852, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15119019pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed