| pubmed-article:1490906 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0007450 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0450429 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1280500 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1948023 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0013786 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0013812 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205191 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0522510 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1993-3-4 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:abstractText | An earlier study conducted in this laboratory suggested that chronic intracochelear electrical stimulation at moderate current levels can at least partially delay or prevent the retrograde degeneration of primary auditory (spiral ganglion) neurons that otherwise is progressive after neonatal deafness induced by ototoxic drug administration. Increased survival of spiral ganglion neurons was observed within the basal cochlear region near the stimulating biopolar electrode pairs, while in more apical regions there was no significant difference between the stimulated and control cochleas. The mechanisms underlying this maintenance of spiral ganglion neurons induced by chronic electrical stimulation are uncertain, especially since increased neuronal survival was observed over broader sectors of the ganglion than would be expected to be directly activated by the bipolar electrodes and moderate stimulation intensity (6 dB above electrically evoked auditory brainstem response threshold) used. In this report, data are presented from a second series of neonatally deafened and chronically stimulated cats. The parameters for chronic electrical stimulation were manipulated in two simple ways. First, the intensity of the electrical stimulus was reduced from the earlier study, while the duration of chronic stimualtion periods was increased; and secondly, two different intracochlear positions of stimulating electrodes were employed in different experimental groups. Results indicate that elecrical stimulation of the cochlea at an extremely low intensity (2 dB above electrically evoked auditory brainstem response threshold) is sufficient to at least partially prevent or delay ganglion cell degeneration in the deafened cochlea. In addition, data suggest a differential distribution of the maintained or conserved ganglion cells, such that when the stimulating electrode pair was positioned near the base of the cochlea increased ganglion survival in a more basal cochlear sector, while stimulation at a more apical site resulted in increased neuronal survival extending to more apical regions. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:month | Dec | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:issn | 0378-5955 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SnyderR LRL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeakeP APA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HradekG TGT | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RebscherS JSJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:volume | 64 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:pagination | 99-117 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1490906-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:year | 1992 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:articleTitle | Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco 94143. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1490906 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1490906 | lld:pubmed |
