Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1482431rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023660lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1482431lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030201lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1482431lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332448lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1482431lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:dateCreated1992-4-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:abstractTextWe conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of preincisional and postincisional wound infiltration with 1% lidocaine (40 mL) on the postoperative pain of 37 patients scheduled for elective inguinal herniotomy. The demand for additional postoperative analgesics occurred earlier in those who received lidocaine infiltration after incision (165 min) than in those who received preincisional lidocaine (225 min, P less than 0.05). The preincisional lidocaine infiltration group also had fewer patients requiring supplemental analgesics (58%) than the postincisional group (94%) (P less than 0.05). We conclude that preincisional infiltration of the surgical wound with lidocaine is a more effective method of providing postoperative analgesia than is postincisional infiltration.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:issn0003-2999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MogensenTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndersenH BHBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EjlersenEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EliasenKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:volume74lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:pagination495-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1482431-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:articleTitleA comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1482431pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1482431lld:pubmed