Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:14640834rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14640834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681797lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14640834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14640834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034955lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14640834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332120lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:dateCreated2003-12-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:abstractTextIn target detection tasks, responses are faster when displays have 2 targets (redundant-targets effect; RTE) and slower when they have no targets (nontargets effect; NTE) relative to displays with a single target. The psychological refractory period paradigm was used to localize these effects. In Experiment 1, participants classified tones as high or low and then classified letters as targets or nontargets after a short or long stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). The magnitudes of the RTE and NTE did not depend on SOA. In Experiment 2, the order of the tasks was reversed, and at short SOAs the RTE and NTE had similar magnitudes for both tone discrimination and target detection responses. These findings suggest that the RTE and NTE arise during response selection. Interactive effects of tone pitch with the number and type of target features were also observed, and these were tentatively interpreted as synesthetic effects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:issn0096-1523lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillerJeffJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReynoldsAnnAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:copyrightInfo((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:volume29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:pagination1126-42lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14640834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14640834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14640834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14640834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:articleTitleThe locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:affiliationUniversity of Otago, Department of Psychology, Dunedin, New Zealand. miller@otago.ac.nzlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14640834pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:14640834lld:pubmed