Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:14571485rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522318lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2698872lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947917lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2348535lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205087lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:dateCreated2003-10-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:abstractTextTo determine the incidence and predictors of total occlusion in-stent restenosis, we reviewed three randomized stent vs. stent trials and one stent registry, which provided 955 coronary artery lesions with 6-month angiographic follow-up. Fifteen (1.6%) of the 955 stented lesions were totally occluded at 6-month follow-up. Most patients with total occlusion presented with recurrent angina at the time of repeat angiography (60.0%) while no patient presented with an acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The univariate predictors of total occlusion following elective coronary stenting included stenting for restenosis after a previous percutaneous intervention (P = 0.001), longer stent length (P < 0.001), longer lesion length (P < 0.001), smaller reference vessel diameter (P = 0.022), smaller preprocedure minimum lumen diameter (MLD; P = 0.004), and smaller postprocedure MLD (P = 0.036). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that stenting for restenotic lesions (P = 0.004), longer stent length (P < 0.001), and smaller preprocedure MLD (P = 0.012) were independent predictors of total occlusion following coronary stenting.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:issn1522-1946lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoKalon K LKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KuntzRichard...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PopmaJeffrey...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CutlipDonald...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShahPinak BPBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:volume60lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:pagination344-51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:14571485...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:articleTitleIncidence and predictors of late total occlusion following coronary stenting.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:affiliationCardiovascular Division, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02135, USA. pinak.shah@tufts.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:14571485pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:14571485lld:pubmed