Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1432027rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220908lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1432027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0428883lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1432027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086930lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1432027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827666lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:dateCreated1992-12-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:abstractTextBecause of variability in diastolic blood pressure within an individual, repeated measurements increase precision in assessing an individual's underlying mean pressure and so also aid risk classification. Data from a cohort of 11,299 middle-aged men is used to model the variability in diastolic pressure between annual measurements. A simple model with pressure normally distributed about an underlying mean with standard deviation increasing with level fits the data very well. In modelling risk of cardiovascular mortality, a strong association is found with observed diastolic pressure level but not to trends in or variability between observed values. The effect of regression dilution is clear with the risk relationship appearing greater as one uses the mean of an increasing number of measurements. A method of adjusting for this regression dilution is described so giving an estimate of the relationship with underlying mean diastolic pressure. Using this survival model and the model for blood pressure variability, a method is presented for estimating both underlying mean pressure and absolute risk of cardiovascular disease given a sequence of blood pressure measurements from screening. This allows a sequential strategy for determining whether (a) antihypertensive intervention is desirable, (b) no further screening is necessary, or (c) further screening would aid the assessment, and emphasizes the need to consider blood pressure in the context of multiple risk factors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:issn0895-4356lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PocockS JSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HughesM DMDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:volume45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:pagination985-98lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1432027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:articleTitleWithin-subject diastolic blood pressure variability: implications for risk assessment and screening.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:affiliationMedical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, U.K.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1432027pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed