| pubmed-article:12962764 | pubmed:abstractText | This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of two immunosuppressant regimens in kidney transplantation based on the administration of tacrolimus-one of them with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and corticosteroids (n=239) and the other with tacrolimus, and corticosteroids (n=236). After completing the initial 3-month study, the patients remaining in the study (197 and 195, respectively) were assessed for 3 years. The incidence of acute rejection (AR) episodes treated during this period was 28.8% with dual-drug therapy and 29.7% with triple-drug therapy. Late AR: episodes between 4 and 36 months were scarce (3.3% in dual and 4.2% in triple therapy). Chronic rejection incidence was 7.7% and 8.9%, respectively. The patients who experienced AR episodes during the first 3 months developed chronic rejection more frequently than those who did not suffer AR. Patient survival at 3 years was 95% vs 95.6%, and graft survival was 86.6% vs 86.5% (NS). Doses and blood levels of tacrolimus were similar in the two groups. Adverse effects were similar among both treatment groups. Median SCr was 123.8 micromol/L vs 114.9 micromol/L in patients who did experience AR: 145.9 micromol/L vs 132.6 micromol/L in those with early AR; and 194.5 micromol/L vs 152 micromol/L in those who presented with late AR. Need for de novo posttransplant insulin was 4.2% in the dual-drug group and 3.8% in the triple-drug cohort. These results demonstrate that, after 3 years of follow up, there were similar efficacy data among the dual- and triple-drug regimens. Thus, addition of azathioprine does not contribute any advantage in the middle term. | lld:pubmed |
