| pubmed-article:12911356 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0549401 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0179390 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1524063 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:issue | 9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2003-8-12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:abstractText | We studied the success rates for tracheal intubation in 32 healthy, anaesthetised patients during simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy, randomised to either the multiple-use or the single-use bougie. Success rates (primary end-point) and times taken (secondary end-point) to achieve tracheal intubation were recorded. The multiple-use bougie was more successful than the single-use one (15/16 successful intubations vs. 9/16; p = 0.03). With either device, median [range] total tracheal intubation times for successful attempts were < 54 [24-84] s and there were no clinically important differences between these times. We conclude that the multiple-use bougie is a more reliable aid to tracheal intubation than the single-use introducer in grade IIIa laryngoscopy. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:month | Sep | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:issn | 0003-2409 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YentisS MSM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PanditJ JJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PopatM TMT | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MarfinA GAG | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HamesK CKC | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:volume | 58 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:pagination | 852-5 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12911356... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:year | 2003 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:articleTitle | Use of the bougie in simulated difficult intubation. 2. Comparison of single-use bougie with multiple-use bougie. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:affiliation | Nuffield Department of Anaesthesia, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9 DU. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12911356 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12911356 | lld:pubmed |
