Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12767565rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12767565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0259787lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12767565lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439211lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:dateCreated2003-5-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:abstractTextTo compare the effectiveness of 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction beyond 41 weeks' gestation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:issn0020-7292lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BurakFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AtmacaRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Cali?kanEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeydanliM MMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NarinM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:volume81lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:pagination249-55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12767565...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:articleTitleLabor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turgut Ozal Medical Centre, School of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey. mmeydanli@inonu.edu.trlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12767565pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed