Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12678354rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242767lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12678354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1186763lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12678354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:dateCreated2003-4-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:abstractTextWe followed the first 354 consecutive implantations of a cementless, double-tapered straight femoral stem in 326 patients. Follow-up was at a mean of 12 years (10 to 15). The mean age of the patients was 57 years (13 to 81). At follow-up, 56 patients (59 hips) had died, and eight (eight hips) had been lost to follow-up. Twenty-five hips underwent femoral revision, eight for infection, three for periprosthetic fracture and 14 for aseptic loosening. The overall survival was 92% at 12 years (95% CI 88 to 95). Survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an endpoint was 95% (95% CI 92 to 98). The median Harris hip score at follow-up was 84 points (23 to 100). Radiolucent lines (< 2 mm) in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 38 (16%) and 34 hips (14%), respectively. Radiolucencies in zones 2 to 6 were found in five hips (2%). The results for mid- to long-term survival with this femoral component are encouraging and compare with those achieved in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty. The high rate of loosening of the cup and the high rate of pain are, however, a source of concern.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:issn0301-620Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MauHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThomsenMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EwerbeckVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LukoschekMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BreuschS JSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AldingerP RPRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:volume85lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:pagination209-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12678354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:articleTitleA ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:affiliationStiftung Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Heidelberg, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12678354pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12678354lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12678354lld:pubmed