| pubmed-article:12554405 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0596545 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0022423 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0237519 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2698172 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1708533 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707689 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:issue | 1-3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2003-1-29 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:abstractText | Many design guidelines encourage maintaining stimulus-response compatibility whenever possible. Payne found that naïve judgments for different stimulus-response (S-R) mappings were not very accurate, and suggested that designers may not be able to predict whether a particular display-control configuration will lead to better performance than another. Three experiments were conducted to determine whether naïve judgments for two-choice tasks in which stimuli and responses involve left-right spatial information are sensitive to (a) the influence of S-R mode relations and (b) pure versus mixed presentation of compatible and incompatible mappings. Initial performance judgments for these conditions were not very accurate, nor were those for four-choice tasks of the type studied by Payne, but subjects' estimates of performance improved with relatively little experience using the different S-R configurations. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:issn | 0014-0139 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ProctorRobert... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VuKim-Phuong... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:day | 15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:volume | 46 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:pagination | 169-87 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2004-11-17 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12554405... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:year | 2003 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:articleTitle | Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1364, USA. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12554405 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
