Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12521503rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12521503lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12521503lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0259787lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12521503lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0425979lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:dateCreated2003-1-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:abstractTextSlow release prostaglandin pessary (propess) is compared with instant release prostaglandin gel (prostin) for the induction of labour in nulliparous women with a modified Bishop's score of less than 6. In this randomised study 50 women received prostin gel and 45 received propess. More than one dose of prostaglandin was required to achieve amniotomy more often in the propess group (53%) compared with the prostin group (34%) (P=0.03). Propess was unable to demonstrate any advantage over Prostin gel group. Propess was not cost-effective in this study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:issn0144-3615lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FairlieF MFMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MukhopadhyayM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LimK J HKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:pagination294-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12521503...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:articleTitleIs propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:affiliationThe Jessop Hospital for Women, Leavygreave Road, Sheffield, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12521503pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed