Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12505467rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001779lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040426lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681916lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680844lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443131lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:dateCreated2002-12-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:abstractTextThe accuracy of age estimation using three quantitative methods of developing permanent teeth was investigated. These were Mörnstad et al. [Scand. J. Dent. Res. 102 (1994) 137], Liversidge and Molleson [J. For. Sci. 44 (1999) 917] and Carels et al. [J. Biol. Bucc. 19 (1991) 297]. The sample consisted of 145 white Caucasian children (75 girls, 70 boys) aged between 8 and 13 years. Tooth length and apex width of mandibular canine, premolars and first and second molars were measured from orthopantomographs using a digitiser. These data were substituted into equations from the three methods and estimated age was calculated and compared to chronological age. Age was under-estimated in boys and girls using all the three methods; the mean difference between chronological and estimated ages for method I was -0.83 (standard deviation +/-0.96) years for boys and -0.67 (+/-0.76) years for girls; method II -0.79 (+/-0.93) and -0.63 (+/-0.92); method III -1.03 (+/-1.48) and -1.35 (+/-1.11) for boys and girls, respectively. Further analysis of age cohorts, found the most accurate method to be method I for the age group 8.00-8.99 years where age could be predicted to 0.14+/-0.44 years (boys) and 0.10+/-0.32 years (girls). Accuracy was greater for younger children compared to older children and this decreased with age.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:issn0379-0738lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LyonsFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HectorM PMPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LiversidgeH...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:day9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:volume131lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:pagination22-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12505467...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:year2003lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:articleTitleThe accuracy of three methods of age estimation using radiographic measurements of developing teeth.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, St. Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London E1 2AD, UK. h.m.liversidge@qmul.ac.uklld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12505467pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed