Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12490329rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007776lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001613lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1304888lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0337380lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:dateCreated2002-12-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:abstractTextElectrical stimulation of the motor cortex (MCS) is a promising and increasingly used neurosurgical technique for the control of refractory neuropathic pain. Although its mechanisms of action remain unknown, recent functional imaging data suggest involvement of the thalamus, brainstem and anterior cingulate/orbitofrontal cortex. Since some of these areas are also implicated in higher cognitive functions, notably attentional processes, we analysed cognitive ERPs and behavioural performance during an "oddball" auditory detection task in patients submitted to this procedure. Eleven consecutive patients undergoing MCS because of neuropathic refractory pain, ranging in age from 25 to 71 years, were included in the study. ERPs were obtained in all cases both during the application ("MCS-on") and within the 10 min that followed discontinuation of the procedure ("MCS-off"). In five patients, ERPs could also be obtained just before the start of MCS. When the patients' sample was taken as a whole, there were no consistent effects of MCS on the ERPs. There was, however, a significant interaction of MCS action with the patients' age, reflecting a significant delay during MCS of the cognitive responses N2 and P3 (N200 and P300) in the group of patients older than 50 years exclusively. This effect was rapidly reversible after MCS discontinuation. No MCS-related changes were observed in the N1 component. At the individual level, the effect of MCS on the endogenous ERPs was highly variable, ranging from a total stability of ERPs (mostly in younger subjects) to latency differences of tens of milliseconds in the older group. These results, together with recent experiments showing P300 alteration during repetitive transcranial stimulation, suggest that motor cortex stimulation may interfere with relatively simple cognitive processes such as those underlying target detection, and that the risk of abnormal cognitive effects related to cortical stimulation may increase with age. Although the procedure appears on the whole remarkably safe, complementary neuropsychological studies in this category of patients are advised, as well as caution to possible adverse cognitive effects when using MCS in the elderly, notably in the presence of pre-existent cerebral lesions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:issn0987-7053lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SindouMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LaurentBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MauguièreFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Garcia-Larrea...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MontesCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ConversPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MertensPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PeyronRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:volume32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:pagination313-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12490329...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:articleTitleCognitive effects of precentral cortical stimulation for pain control: an ERP study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:affiliationEquipe d'accueil, EA1880 UCB, Lyon, France.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12490329pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed