Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12369126rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0538727lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0017725lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031139lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0678640lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1524063lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332169lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:dateCreated2002-10-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:abstractTextIcodextrin (IC) is an osmotic agent that produces sustained ultrafiltration (UF) during long dwell time periods in peritoneal dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 7.5% IC for the diurnal exchange in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients and to compare them with that of 2.27% glucose solutions. Seventeen patients treated on APD during 13.9 +/- 12.7 months were included. The study was divided into three eight weeks phases. During the baseline period patients used 2.27% glucose for the daytime, second, IC 7.5% was prescribed for the day-exchange, and finally 2.27% glucose solution was used for the last eight weeks. Daytime UF increased in all patients during IC use (-53 +/- 22 to 270 +/- 304 ml/day, p < 0.01). Patients with higher peritoneal permeability capacity obtained more benefits. Daytime urea KT/V and weekly creatinine clearance (WCC) augmented significantly during IC use, but the increase of weekly urea KT/V and WCC was not significant (2.18 +/- 0.45 to 2.26 +/- 0.41 and 62.7 +/- 18 to 66.6 +/- 15 l/week/1.73 m2; respectively). On IC, nightly glucose load significantly decreased (289 +/- 82 to 266 +/- 94 g, p < 0.05), returning to previous value after withdrawal. Plasma osmolality did not change, although plasma sodium levels decreased during IC use (140 +/- 3 to 136 +/- 2, p < 0.001). Serum amylase levels significantly declined during IC use (279 +/- 151 to 29 +/- 9 U/l), returning to previous values after transfer to glucose. Peritoneal function transport parameters and peritoneal protein losses did not change. IC metabolite plasma levels increased during the use of this solution, returning to previous values after withdrawal. In conclusion, IC dialysate is an excellent alternative to glucose dialysate for the day-exchange in APD patients. Daytime UF increased in all patients, but those with higher peritoneal permeability capacity obtained more benefits. The decrease of the glucose peritoneal load overnight and the reduction for more than 50% of exposure time of the peritoneal membrane to glucose solutions, probably make IC solution a more biocompatible fluid.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:languagespalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:issn0211-6995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JiménezCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GilFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BajoM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SelgasRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CastroM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeviaCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:del PesoGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CosteroOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OleaTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:pagination348-55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12369126...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:articleTitle[Use of icodextrin for diurnal exchange in patients undergoing automatic peritoneal dialysis. Comparison with glucose solutions].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:affiliationServicio de Nefrología Hospital Universitario La Paz Paseo de la Castellana, 261 28046 Madrid. mabajo@hulp.insalud.eslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12369126pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed