Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12223971rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011923lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12223971lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2895224lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:issue9 Pt 2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:dateCreated2002-9-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:abstractTextScoliosis is frequent, especially during the peripubertal period, which corresponds to the period of greatest activity. About 75% of scoliosis are idiopathic, while the remaining 25% can be divided into neuromuscular, congenital and miscellaneous etiologies. When it is associated with pain, a comprehensive work up should be undertaken to identify the underlying etiology of the scoliosis. Idiopathic scoliosis is typically evaluated using standard radiographs. The number of follow-up radiographs and radiation exposure must be maintained to a minimum. Radiation safety guidelines and protocols must be implemented. Large cassettes can be replaced by digital acquisitions using units with reconstruction software. The technique of evaluation of these scoliosis series radiographs as well as their results will be reviewed. Recent data regarding the evaluation of spinal and pelvic balance parameters in the standing position will be introduced. Atypical idiopathic and other scoliosis require additional evaluation. Computed tomography, with 2D and 3D reformations, is ideal for evaluation of bony anomalies. MRI is ideal for evaluation of the spinal canal and cord, from the skull base down to the sacrum, for all patients with surgical scoliosis or patients with neurological symptoms. The increased availability of MR imaging has resulted in an increased number of so-called idiopathic asymptomatic scoliosis where an underlying anomaly can be identified.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:issn0221-0363lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DiardFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChateilJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoinardMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaugenCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Ducou-Lepoint...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:volume83lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:pagination1117-39; discussion 1141-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12223971...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:articleTitle[Imaging of chilhood and adolescent scoliosis].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:affiliationService de Radiologie A, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. francois.diard@chu-bordeaux.frlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12223971pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed