| pubmed-article:12175557 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034603 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1441416 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2002-8-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:abstractText | An analysis of computed tomography (CT)-based dosimetry was performed to evaluate the variability of different observers' judgements in marking the prostate gland on CT films, and its effect on the parameters that characterise the prostate implantation quality. Accuracy of data entry by the first author in the process of dosimetry procedure has also been evaluated. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:month | Mar | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:issn | 0167-8140 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JuLL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Al-QaisiehBas... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BottomleyDavi... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CareyBrendan... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:volume | 62 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:pagination | 267-73 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-3-23 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:12175557... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:year | 2002 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:articleTitle | Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:affiliation | Medical Physics Department, Cookridge Hospital, Hospital Lane, Leeds LS16 6QB, UK. bashar@medphysics.leeds.ac.uk | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:12175557 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12175557 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:12175557 | lld:pubmed |
