Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12090352rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014441lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0949466lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:dateCreated2002-7-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:abstractTextChemokines in biological sample are frequently found at very low level. Further, concentrations of chemokines which were measured in the same tissue detected with different methods often differ in literature. Therefore, RANTES concentrations were quantified by application of sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot analyses. The sensitivity of ELISA was found to be much higher than that of Western blot. Additionally, the detection time differed considerably as well. For biological and biochemical characterization of chemokines it is essential to implement the optimal purification and detection techniques. With an understanding of the technical procedures and some pitfalls, chemokine detection can be applied more reliably.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:issn1078-0297lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeyerJ EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeissJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MauneSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoeroeghTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:volume110lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:pagination139-42lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12090352...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:articleTitleA comparative study of chemokine rantes detection using ELISA and Western blot.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12090352pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed