Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12001625rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035168lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12001625lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243161lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12001625lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036397lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12001625lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349101lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:issue68lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:dateCreated2002-5-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this article is to present the evaluative criteria of qualitative and quantitative research. Philosophical foundations of positivism, postpositivism and constructivism are explored. Triangulation and crystallization expose the controversies about them. Finally, Lincoln and Guba criteria are retained for the evaluation of qualitative and quantitative research.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:citationSubsetNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:issn0297-2964lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PelletierCéli...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PagéGinetteGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:pagination35-42lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12001625...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:articleTitle[Criteria of scientific validity in research].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:affiliationUniversité du Québec à Rimouski, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12001625pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed