Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11939924rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022864lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0143993lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0073571lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002769lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439294lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1178443lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:dateCreated2002-4-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:abstractTextIn recent studies, minimum local analgesic concentrations have been defined as 0.93 mg/mL for bupivacaine and 1.56 mg/mL for ropivacaine for epidural analgesia for the first stage of labour, resulting in an analgesic potency ratio of 1 : 0.6. In the current study we compared ropivacaine and bupivacaine in a PCEA system (combined with sufentanil) taking this potency ratio into account but administering drug doses providing sufficient analgesia for all stages of labour.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:issn0001-5172lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchwenderDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SarafSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZwisslerBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BernasconiHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Hofmann-Kiefe...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrederodeAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:volume46lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:pagination316-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11939924...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:articleTitleRopivacaine 2 mg/mL vs. bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL with sufentanil using patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:affiliationKlinik für Anäesthesiologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Innenstadt, Munich, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11939924pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11939924lld:pubmed