pubmed-article:11920388 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0016614 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1305231 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030471 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0013103 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0040395 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0700320 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0441633 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449774 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205313 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1705492 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:issue | 4 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2002-3-28 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:abstractText | The Omo L338y-6 occipital region has been recently studied by White and Falk (1999), who claim that it shows a readily identifiable enlarged left occipital-marginal sinus (O/M). These observations are contrary to the direct observations of previous investigators (Rak and Howell, 1978; Kimbel, 1984; Holloway, 1981; Holloway, 1988). White and Falk (1999) further argue that the presence of this enlarged O/M strongly suggests that the Omo L338y-6 hominid was indeed a "robust" Australopithecus. We used direct sectioning and CT scanning to analyze magnified sections of a high-quality first-generation cast of the newly cleaned original fossil. These methods fail to show any evidence of a morphological landmark that can be interpreted as an enlarged O/M, either as an eminence or a sulcus. In contrast, the same techniques used with both SK 1585 and OH5 ("robust" Australopithecus with an enlarged O/M) show extremely visible and palpable enlarged O/M's. Examination of the original Omo fossil confirms that it lacks an O/M. This evidence clearly shows that an enlarged O/M cannot be identified on either the original fossil or a first-generation cast, although this does not rule out the possibility that the Omo L338y-6 hominid was a "robust" Australopithecus. We believe that the differences between observers regarding this feature are most probably due to displacement caused by a crack and the different source materials employed, i.e., the difference between a first-generation cast of the original fossil and a third- or fourth-generation cast of the endocast made two decades ago. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:month | Apr | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:issn | 0003-276X | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WhiteTim DTD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HollowayRalph... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YuanMichael... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BroadfieldDou... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DegustaDavidD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RichardsGary... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SilversAdamA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ShapiroJill... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:copyrightInfo | Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:day | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:volume | 266 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:pagination | 249-57 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11920388... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:year | 2002 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:articleTitle | Missing Omo L338y-6 occipital-marginal sinus drainage pattern: ground sectioning, computer tomography scanning, and the original fossil fail to show it. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA. rlh2@columbia.edu | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11920388 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |