Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11890420rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032850lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1512080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0241737lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1548993lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1549004lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:dateCreated2002-3-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:abstractTextTwo trials conducted in 1996-97 measured BW and body condition score changes of cows fed different sources of degradable intake protein, including dried poultry waste and soybean meal, while grazing low-quality winter forages. In Trial 1, 60 spring-calving cows (5 yr; 555 kg) were used in an individual supplementation trial. Cows were gathered three times a week, sorted into individual pens, and fed their respective supplement. Cows grazed dormant native Sandhills winter range (common pasture) and were assigned to one of six supplemental treatments: 1) no supplement, 2) urea, 3) 22% dried poultry waste + urea, 4) soybean meal, 5) 22% dried poultry waste + soybean meal, or 6) 44% dried poultry waste. All supplements were based on wheat middlings and soybean hulls and were formulated to contain 44% CP. Thirty-six cows were selected randomly (six per treatment) for a 5-d measurement of forage intake from December 16 through December 20, 1996. Cows receiving supplements gained more weight (P < 0.001) and maintained greater body condition (P < 0.001) than unsupplemented cows. Cows receiving urea gained less (P < 0.10) than cows receiving a source of natural protein, but body condition remained similar. No differences were found in daily forage or total organic matter intake (P > 0.10). In Trial 2, cows grazed corn residues. Forty-eight spring-calving cows were group-fed supplements in one of six 4-ha paddocks. Cows received supplements containing either soybean meal or dried poultry waste that were the same as the soybean meal and 44% dried poultry waste supplements fed in Trial 1; gains were not different (P > 0.10). Under the economic conditions that existed at the time of these experiments, the supplement containing dried poultry waste resulted in a savings of $.04 per cow per day and a total savings of $3.20 per cow over an 80-d period. Feeding a supplement containing dried poultry waste resulted in performance similar to that when feeding a more conventional supplement containing soybean meal.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:issn0021-8812lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KlopfensteinT...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AdamsD CDClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JordonD JDJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:volume80lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:pagination818-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11890420...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:articleTitleDried poultry waste for cows grazing low-quality winter forage.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11890420pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed