Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11846327rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1556096lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205474lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014939lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0244404lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0279495lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0232970lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0549178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205195lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:dateCreated2002-2-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:abstractTextWe treated 116 healthy postmenopausal women (age 47-66 years, mean 57 years) in Taiwan with either raloxifene (RLX) 60 mg (n = 92) or 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen plus 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (CCEP, n = 24) daily for 12 months in a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled fashion. The results showed that both regimens increased bone mineral density (BMD) at hip sites (means: RLX 2.5-4.9%, CCEP 4.6-7.9%, all p<0.005 compared with baseline), and the difference between the two regimens was not significant. The spinal BMD increased significantly in both groups (1.4% with RLX and 6.0% with CCEP, both p<0.01), and more with CCEP (p<0.003). Osteocalcin levels and urinary type I collagen C-telopeptide/creatinine ratios decreased significantly in both regimens, but the decreases were significantly larger with CCEP. Compared with baseline, both RLX and CCEP decreased the total cholesterol (median 4.9% and 8.6% respectively, p<0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (median 11% and 19% respectively, p<0.001), and increased HDL-cholesterol (median 8.6% and 10.7% respectively, p<0.01). Both regimens increased triglyceride levels (median 3.2% and 18.9% respectively, both p<0.05), although to a lesser extent with RLX than with CCEP (p<0.05). Only 3 subjects (3.3%) reported vaginal bleeding in the RLX group, as compared with 31% (7/22) with CCEP (p<0.05). We conclude that in healthy, postmenopausal Taiwanese women, RLX 60 mg given daily has favorable results in BMD, bone turnover and serum lipids, although the dosage we used showed a potency less than that of conventional CCEP.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:issn0937-941Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HsuS HSHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TsaiK SKSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuangK EKElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChengW CWClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WuM HMHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SeoS SSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LamD HDHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YenB LBLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:volume12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:pagination1020-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11846327...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:articleTitleRaloxifene versus continuous combined estrogen/progestin therapy: densitometric and biochemical effects in healthy postmenopausal Taiwanese women.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and Medical College, Taipei, ROC.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11846327pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed