Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11816120rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516634lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1261322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439200lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332306lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511958lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:dateCreated2002-1-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:abstractTextThe objective of this article is to assess the quality of digital images versus standard 35-mm photodocumentation and to undertake a comparative assessment of 35-mm and digital photography in a clinical setting in facial plastic surgery. For evaluation of image quality, 10 subjects had images captured via a conventional 35-mm single lens reflex (SLR) camera and a digital camera under identical lighting conditions. The digital images were transferred to computer hard drive and processed for production of slides. Direct side-by-side comparison of projected images was performed by the authors. The standard photographic slides were of slightly finer detail and crispness than the computer-generated images. In a clinical setting, the quality of both the 35-mm and digital photographs enables complete preoperative evaluation and assessment of postsurgical outcome.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:issn0736-6825lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WalzAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckerD GDGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckerS SSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KazahayaKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:volume15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:pagination101-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11816120...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:articleTitleThirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11816120pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11816120lld:pubmed