Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11768050rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010453lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0459471lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009671lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332189lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041703lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1882932lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514861lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:dateCreated2001-12-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:abstractTextThis article integrates theory from the cognitive tradition in negotiation with theory on culture and examines cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict. The authors predicted that although there may be universal (etic) dimensions of conflict construals, there also may be culture-specific (emic) representations of conflict in the United States and Japan. Results of multidimensional scaling analyses of U.S. and Japanese conflict episodes supported this view. Japanese and Americans construed conflicts through a compromise versus win frame (R. L. Pinkley, 1990), providing evidence of a universal dimension of conflict construal. As the authors predicted, Japanese perceived conflicts to be more compromise-focused, as compared with Americans. There were also unique dimensions of construal among Americans and Japanese (infringements to self and giri violations, respectively), suggesting that identical conflict episodes are perceived differently across cultures.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:issn0021-9010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GelfandM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DyesOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FukunoMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NishiiL HLHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HolcombeK MKMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OhbuchiK IKIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:volume86lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:pagination1059-74lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11768050...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:articleTitleCultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA. mgelfand@psyc.umd.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11768050pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed