Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11740455rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040405lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348026lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441889lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1561577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514811lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706462lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:dateCreated2001-12-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:abstractTextThe absorbed dose during clinical examinations of the head, thorax, abdomen and pelvis performed with a single-slice CT scanner and a new multi-slice CT system was measured and compared. Technical parameters, defined at installation and memorized on the two CT machines relate to a standard-sized patient and were considered the reference standard. Our experimental data were also been compared with the Diagnostic Reference Levels (D.L. 26/5/2000 n.187, Annex V).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:languageitalld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:issn0033-8362lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoriJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BertoliGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaldoGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FantinatoDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BolsiAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:volume102lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:pagination262-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:dateRevised2008-10-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11740455...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11740455...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11740455...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:articleTitle[Single-slice and multi-slice computerized tomography: dosimetric comparison with diagnostic reference dose levels].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:affiliationServizio di Fisica Sanitaria IRCCS, Istituto Scientifico, Pavia, Italy. lmoro@fsm.itlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11740455pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed