| pubmed-article:11725598 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0457949 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0080331 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0039593 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0022885 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2347947 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2001-11-29 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:abstractText | Walking is an important functional activity and the shuttle walking test has been shown to be a useful test for patients with chronic airways obstruction and heart failure. The test has been used in low back pain research over recent years and has increasingly been used as an outcome measure to investigate treatment efficacy in patients with low back pain. The aim of the present study was to determine the reliability and responsiveness of the shuttle walking test within a group of patients with low back pain (with or without sciatica). | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:issn | 1358-2267 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TaylorSS | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BarkerKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GREEPR WRW | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TaylorAA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:volume | 6 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:pagination | 170-8 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11725598... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:year | 2001 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:articleTitle | Reliability and responsiveness of the shuttle walking test in patients with chronic low back pain. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:affiliation | Physiotherapy Department, Royal London Hospital, London. stewart_taylor@bigfoot.com | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11725598 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11725598 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11725598 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11725598 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11725598 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11725598 | lld:pubmed |
