| pubmed-article:11657203 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0680226 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0699794 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1704769 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0002464 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1999-10-10 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:abstractText | Unlike the American Psychological Association (APA), the Canadian Psychological Association has adopted a code of ethics in which principles are organized in order of importance. The validity of this hierarchical organization has received some empirical and theoretical support. We conducted a theoretical analysis that revealed conceptual justification for a ranking of the 6 principles in the APA code. Such a ranking could assist psychologists in making more informed and consistent moral choices when confronted with ethical dilemmas that involve conflicts among principles. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:keyword | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:keyword | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:keyword | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:keyword | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:citationSubset | E | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:issn | 1050-8422 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Hadjistavropo... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MalloyDavid... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:volume | 9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:owner | KIE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:pagination | 127-40 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2004-11-17 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11657203... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:year | 1999 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:articleTitle | Ethical principles of the American Psychological Association: an argument for philosophical and practical ranking. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:11657203 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
