| pubmed-article:11604723 | pubmed:abstractText | We evaluated the utility of the CEN Categorical Structure for Nursing Diagnoses as a terminology model for integrating nursing diagnosis concepts into SNOMED. First, we dissected nursing diagnosis term phrases from two source terminologies (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Taxonomy 1 and Omaha System) into the semantic categories of the CEN categorical structure. Second, we critically analyzed the similarities between the semantic links in the CEN model and the semantic links used to formally define diagnostic concepts in SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT. Our findings demonstrated that focus, bearer, and judgment were present in 100% of the NANDA and Omaha term phrases. The Omaha term phrases contained no additional descriptors beyond those considered mandatory in the CEN model. In contrast, at least 3% of NANDA diagnoses included a term in each semantic category of the categorical structure. The comparison among the semantic links showed that neither SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT currently contain all the semantic links needed to model the two source terminologies for integration. In conclusion, our findings support the potential utility of the CEN categorical structure as a terminology model for dissecting nursing diagnostic concepts for integration into SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT. However, in order to accomplish this task, appropriate semantic links must be added to SNOMED RT and SNOMED CT. | lld:pubmed |
