Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11497962rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521991lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205148lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001674lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0678597lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521116lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871935lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596917lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:issue8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:dateCreated2001-8-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:abstractTextNew experimental structure determinations for molecular adsorbates on NiO(100) reveal much shorter Ni-C and Ni-N bond lengths for adsorbed CO and NH3 as well as NO (2.07, 1.88, 2.07 A) than previously computed theoretical values, with discrepancies up to 0.79 A, highlighting a major weakness of current theoretical descriptions of oxide-molecule bonding. Comparisons with experimentally determined bond lengths of the same species adsorbed atop Ni on metallic Ni(111) show values on the oxide surface that are consistently larger (0.1-0.3 A) than on the metal, indicating somewhat weaker bonding.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:statusPubMed-not-MEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:issn0031-9007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaneJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaiIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PascalMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KittelMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WoodruffD PDPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoeftJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PolcikMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ToomesR LRLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LamontC LCLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:day20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:volume87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:pagination086101lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:dateRevised2003-10-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:articleTitleMolecular adsorption bond lengths at metal oxide surfaces: failure of current theoretical methods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:affiliationFritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, D14195 Berlin, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11497962pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed