Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11490760rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11490760lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11490760lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0278554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11490760lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:dateCreated2001-8-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:abstractTextWe have shown previously that the bodies of vertebrates are made of a somatic and a visceral component, separated by thin fascial sheets (Chirurg 66: 1230). We postulated that advanced visceral cancers are confined in their pattern of lymphatic spread to one or a few distinct metastatic pathways. In this they are fundamentally different from somatic cancers. To investigate this hypothesis in vivo, we evaluated positive lymph nodes (LNs) on PET scan series of 58 consecutive patients with rectum cancers (RC) compared to breast cancers (BC). We conclude that in RC, a visceral cancer spreads mostly along only one caudocranial pathway (regional, para-aortic, mediastinal, supraclavicular LNs) and never affects somatic LNs. In contrast, BC and urogenital carcinomas, as somatic cancers spread to regional somatic LNs, but do not affect visceral LNs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:issn0009-4722lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StelznerFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RuhlmannJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:volume72lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:pagination818-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11490760...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:articleTitle[PET examinations of recurrent rectal carcinoma, 2].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:affiliationZentrum für Chirurgie, Universität Bonn.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11490760pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed