Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11379452rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027573lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0427965lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011929lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1697858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205547lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:dateCreated2001-5-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:abstractTextThe minimising inhibitory concentrations of four antimicrobial agents for 64 clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae including 26 penicillinase producing strains (PPNG) as determined by E test, a recently developed method for sensitivity testing, were compared with those of agar dilution method using isosensitest (IST) agar. The medium was supplemented with either 5% lysed horse blood alone or with both lysed horse blood and 1% vitox defined supplement. The E test MICs compared closely with those obtained by agar dilution with essential agreements within +/- 1 log2 dilution being over 90% with all test antibiotics on medium that did not contain vitox, and between 71 and 93% on medium containing vitox. The Pearson's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 on either medium formulation. Excellent categorical agreement was obtained for all isolates with ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline, while the E test gave a minor categorical discrepancy for two isolates with penicillin. We conclude that the E test is as reliable as conventional agar dilution method for MIC testing of N. gonorrhoeae in a routine laboratory.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:issn0309-3913lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Adeyemi-DoroF...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChengA FAFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LingT KTKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LyonD JDJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:volume29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:pagination171-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11379452...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:articleTitleE-test method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae for routine diagnostic service.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11379452pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed