Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11302371rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035820lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036576lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597931lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021469lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948020lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:dateCreated2001-4-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:abstractTextSwitching between tasks leads to response-time (RT) costs at switch points (local switch costs) and often to RT costs at no-switch transitions that occur in the context of a task-switching block (global set-selection costs). With trial-to-trial cuing of tasks, moderate age effects were obtained for local switch costs, but large age effects were obtained for global selection costs. In Experiment 1, set-specific inhibition was found to be at least as large in old as in young adults, thus ruling out an inhibition deficit as a reason for age differences in global costs. In Experiment 2, large age differences in global costs were limited to conditions of ambiguous stimuli and full response-set overlap. This pattern of results suggests a greater reliance on set-updating processes in old than in young adults. The role of these processes is to ensure unambiguos internal control settings when ambiguity arises from stimuli and response specifications.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:issn0882-7974lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MazaCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:pagination96-109lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11302371...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:year2001lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:articleTitleAge differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA. mayr@oregon.uoregon.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11302371pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11302371lld:pubmed