pubmed-article:11273403 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1555029 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11273403 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1516050 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11273403 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1552603 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11273403 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1706202 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11273403 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332514 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2001-3-1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:abstractText | We report evidence demonstrating that a search asymmetry favoring concave over convex targets can be reversed by altering the figure-ground assignment of edges in shapes. Visual search for a concave target among convex distractors is faster than search for a convex target among concave distractors (a search asymmetry). By using shapes with ambiguous local figure-ground relations, we demonstrated that search can be efficient (with search slopes around 10 ms/item) or inefficient (with search slopes around 30-40 ms/item) with the same stimuli, depending on whether edges are assigned to concave or convex "figures." This assignment process can operate in a top-down manner, according to the task set. The results suggest that attention is allocated to spatial regions following the computation of figure-ground relations in parallel across the elements present. This computation can also be modulated by top-down processes. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:issn | 0956-7976 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MüllerHH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HumphreysG... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:volume | 11 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:pagination | 196-201 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2011-5-20 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:11273403... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:year | 2000 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:articleTitle | A search asymmetry reversed by figure-ground assignment. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:affiliation | Cognitive Science Research Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. g.w.humphreys@bham.ac.uk | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:11273403 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:11273403 | lld:pubmed |