Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:112076rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205129lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035253lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1534709lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016441lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:dateCreated1979-10-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:abstractTextThe radiological appearance of 26 patients was studied 11--53 months postoperatively following sagittal split osteotomy. In 75% of the cases examined an increase in the mandibular angle could be noted compared to pretreatment values. This differences was statistically significant. In 70% of the cases the angle increased by 1--10 degrees. In 25% there was no change or reduction in the angle. The antero-posterior width of the rami was found to decrease; when this was combined with an increase in the mandibular angle, extensive morphological changes were found. These postoperative conditions must be regarded as unsatisfactory and a modification of the technique of sagittal split osteotomy should be considered as for example advocated by EPKER4.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:issn0300-9785lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WelanderUUlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JönssonEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SvartzKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:volume8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:pagination89-94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-F...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-F...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-P...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-O...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-R...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:112076-T...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:year1979lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:articleTitleSagittal split technique. III. Postoperative rest conditions. A radiographic follow-up study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:112076pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed