| pubmed-article:11053624 | pubmed:abstractText | In many countries, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have replaced unfractionated heparin (UH) for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The present paper reviews the possible advantages of LMWHs over UH. In spite of their lower molecular weight distribution, LMWHs are functionally more heterogeneous than UH. Their anti-Xa/anti-IIa ratio varies significantly, and the injection of the same dose generates different anti-Xa activities and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) prolongations. Their pharmacodynamic properties account for their more convenient use in comparison with UH; however, there is a risk of accumulation in case of renal insufficiency. Even if they are less anticoagulant on the basis of the APTT prolongation, they are not less prohemorrhagic than UH. LMWHs are probably less immunogenic and probably induce less osteoporosis. Several meta-analyses published between 1992 and 1999 indicate that LMWHs are as efficient as UH in preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in general surgery and more efficient than UH in preventing DVT in orthopedic surgery and treating established DVT. | lld:pubmed |
