Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10968425rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0324143lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0460148lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0227814lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0694756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012472lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1268086lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332152lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021586lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:dateCreated2000-10-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:abstractTextTwo trials were conducted to investigate the effects of intrauterine infusion of PGE2 and uterine horn insemination on pregnancy rates in mares achieved by breeding with a suboptimal number of normal spermatozoa. Estrus was synchronized and mares were teased daily with a stallion to detect estrus. Mares in estrus were examined by transrectal palpation and ultrasonography to monitor follicular status. On the first day a 35-mm diameter follicle was present, hCG (1500 IU, iv) was administered and the mares were bred the next day. Mares (Trial 1, n = 34; Trial 2, n = 28) were inseminated with 25 million total spermatozoa from either a stallion with good semen quality (Trial 1) or poor semen quality (Trial 2). In each trial, mares were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups as follows: Group PGE-HI - infusion of 0.25 mg PGE2 into the proximal end of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the dominant follicle 2 h prior to insemination in the proximal end of the same uterine horn; Group PGE-BI - infusion of 0.25 mg PGE2 into the proximal end of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the dominant follicle 2 h prior to insemination in the uterine body; Group SAL-HI - infusion of 1 mL sterile saline into the proximal end of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the dominant follicle 2 h prior to insemination in the proximal end of the same uterine horn; or Group SAL-BI - infusion of 1 mL sterile saline into the proximal end of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the dominant follicle 2 h prior to insemination in the uterine body. After breeding, mares were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography to confirm ovulation, and were re-examined 14 to 16 d after ovulation for pregnancy status. Data were analyzed by Chi-square. Overall pregnancy rates were 59% for stallion 1 and 29% for stallion 2. Group pregnancy rates did not differ for mares bred by either stallion (P > 0.10). Pregnancy rates were not altered by horn insemination for either stallion (P > 0.10). Intrauterine infusion of PGE2 improved pregnancy rate in mares bred by the stallion with good quality semen (P < 0.05), but did not alter pregnancy rate in mares bred by the stallion with poor quality semen (P > 0.10). Further research is warranted to determine if intrauterine infusion of PGE2 will enhance spermatozoal colonization of the oviduct and pregnancy rates in mares, and if PGE-treatment will improve pregnancy rates achieved by subfertile stallions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:issn0093-691Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StephensRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WoodsJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VarnerDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BlanchardTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RigbySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrinskoSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:volume53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:pagination1827-36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:dateRevised2003-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10968425...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:articleTitleEffect of intrauterine treatment with prostaglandin E2 prior to insemination of mares in the uterine horn or body.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4475, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10968425pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed